Three competitors, one evidence rule. Every claim says where it came from, or says plainly that nobody has checked it.
Four pages, each comparing Teylo against one named product. Three are companion products: Replika, Character.AI and Nomi. The fourth is ChatGPT, which is not one at all, and is here because it is the comparison most people are actually making.
Nobody has paid for any of these products and run the multi-week tests that would answer questions like whether memory actually holds up after months, or whether a companion actually disagrees with you rather than just agreeing. That testing hasn't happened yet, so every page marks those rows as untested instead of guessing.
The most established name in the category, and the most credible marketing we found in it.
Millions of user-made characters, against four fixed people with names.
The category's clearest example of romance and roleplay marketed outright.
Not a companion product at all, and the comparison most people are actually making.
We only say things about a competitor that they say about themselves, taken from their own site on a date we write down. Where we could not check something, the row says so.
And every page names three things the other one does better. Not softened, not the kind that are really compliments — the real ones, the reasons you might pick them over us.
Same numbers as everywhere else on the site.